Scenario B · Monthly Rotation
Same 21-individual load
Individuals bucket is identical to Scenario A — 21 teachers, monthly cadence, ~5/week. What changes is calendar fragmentation: with team meetings at varied times, the week is more responsive but harder to protect.
| Week | Focus |
| Week 1 | new 2 new-to-CMS · onboarding |
| Week 2 | reached 2 reached-out · observation |
| Week 3 | split 2 splits reached 2 reached-out · debrief |
| Week 4 | new 3 new-to-CMS split 2 splits |
| Flex | Drop-ins, urgent asks, modeling |
Scenario B · Why embedding is the primary lever
Coach presence carries the weight
With flexible schedules, the coach can physically attend meetings for teams that most need support. This makes the high-dosage model viable — real-time feedback, in-the-moment redirects, artifact review inside the meeting.
Tradeoff to name: this model depends on the coach being the primary support. If the coach is out or moved, the structure wobbles. The distributive leadership benefit of Scenario A is partially traded away.